The concern over soaring prescription drug prices continues to dominate headlines, attracting scrutiny from Capitol Hill and President Donald Trump, who said during a January press conference that the industry was “getting away with murder.”
But some doctors — frustrated by what they see as unreasonable price tags and political stagnation — are coming up with do-it-yourself solutions. Their efforts to bring down costs for their patients highlight the arbitrary and often needlessly exorbitant prices of drugs in the U.S., they say.
One striking example is the response of Dr. Cathleen London, a family doctor in Milbridge, Maine, to news that the pharmaceutical company Mylan had driven up the prices of its signature EpiPen, a branded auto-injecting device containing a preset dose of epinephrine, a lifesaving drug, to be used by people at risk of experiencing anaphylactic shock triggered by an allergy. “I thought: This is disgusting. There’s got to be another auto-injector,” she said. “I started Googling.”
She ended up devising a workaround for her patients who needed one.
“I basically build an auto-injector. I can do it for pediatric and adult dosing,” she said. “I found the right syringe. I put in the dose that I wanted. Whether it’s expired or used, people come back and refill it.”
The price of EpiPens has surged in recent years — an increase connected to the device, not the active ingredient, epinephrine, which costs pennies. A two-pack now costs more than $600, up from just over $100 in 2009. In response to public outcry and lawmaker scrutiny, Mylan last December released its own generic version of the device at about half the cost, but that’s still out of reach for many.
Meanwhile, some insurers have dropped coverage of the pricey name-brand auto-injector pack or made sure customers have access to cost-effective alternatives. Drugstore chain CVS reduced the price of a generic competitor. But all still cost at least $109.
Cathleen London said she was motivated to build her own auto-injector when she saw headlines about EpiPen’s price hike. (Courtesy of Cathleen London)
Fixes like Dr. London’s can alleviate the pricing issue, but replicating this approach on a large scale could pose problems, since someone with medical expertise must do the refilling to avoid contaminating the device, meet quality standards for the device itself, and make the user aware of any safety issues that using the injector might pose.
Still, for customers with little money to spare, innovations like Dr. London’s might represent a path to more security. In addition to costing less, her process tackles a key issue. EpiPen auto-injectors aren’t reusable, and epinephrine expires after 18 months, so people with serious allergies must get a fresh device each year.
London charges her patients $50 for an initial device, and $2.50 for a refill.
“There’s value to the auto-injector, but it is not built in a way that’s refillable or reusable,” said Stephen Schondelmeyer, a professor at the University of Minnesota College of Pharmacy, who heads its department of pharmaceutical care and health systems.
Mylan points out, though, that the EpiPen is designed specifically to administer epinephrine quickly and properly in an emergency situation and quotes the Food and Drug Administration in saying that the “the device that delivers the medication is just as critical.” Nevertheless, critics say that doesn’t justify the skyrocketing of the price paid for a device that has remained unchanged for years.
In the past, insurance has shielded consumers from most of the rising costs of prescription medicine. But that’s changed in recent years, as health insurance plans have increasingly required greater cost-sharing — typically through so-called high-deductible health plans, in which beneficiaries pay more out-of-pocket before coverage kicks in. Many of the GOP-backed plans under consideration in the effort to dismantle the Affordable Care Act emphasize this style of coverage, meaning more allergy patients would experience directly the consequences of this price surge, which has drawn scrutiny from the Senate Judiciary Committee. The issue also came up during a recent confirmation hearing for the Trump administration’s pick to head the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, this time in regard to costs for federal health programs.
London helps her patients sidestep the costs of an EpiPen by purchasing reusable auto-injectors manufactured by the British company Owen Mumford. She fills it with epinephrine herself. (Both the auto-injector and hormone are approved by the Food and Drug Administration.) Patients can come in for an epinephrine refill after they’ve used the dose, or after it’s expired.
“It’s just a no-brainer to do this,” she said.
Experts say there’s no easy way to calculate what is spent annually on EpiPens that are thrown away because they are past their expiration date. Given the price tag, it’s likely many millions of dollars.
Such workarounds can help individuals mitigate climbing costs, though they require extraordinary effort by the doctor and trust from the patient. London did a lot of research to find an auto-injector that was appropriate. The one she settled on is generally marketed for use with insulin syringes, but can also be used for many medications.
The strategy is not without risks, noted Schondelmeyer, who worries about issues of sterility in a reusable device and other safeguards surrounding products made beyond the scope of FDA’s watchful eye. That’s why he is among those who caution against do-it-yourself remedies and against applying such approaches on a larger scale.
Meanwhile, if a company were to attempt to market such a product, they would likely run into federal regulations and safety standards. Setting up a factory, or otherwise mass-producing the device, he added, would face regulatory hoops that could take years to clear before the product would be available.
“These sound like simple solutions,” said Schondelmeyer. “But these aren’t market-based solutions that can work broadly.”
Other health professionals and government health agencies have employed strategies to deal with the EpiPen’s escalating price tag. In at least a dozen states, pilot programs are either underway or being explored for emergency medical technicians to replace the EpiPens they carry with reusable syringes kits.
For example, participating EMTs in New York are given syringes, which can be filled with epinephrine on the spot. Analysts estimate that between $6 million and $10 million is spent annually by the state’s first responders on EpiPens “that are generally never used,” said Jeremy Cushman, an associate professor of emergency medicine at the University of Rochester, who’s leading the New York effort. Using refillable syringes, he said, the total expense per year comes below $400,000.
“You’re looking at well over an order of magnitude of savings,” Cushman said.
This replacement makes sense for people with medical training, like EMTs, Cushman said. But it doesn’t work for everyone.
And some institutions, such as school systems, have been slower to contemplate this and other replacement options — in part because they have less incentive to do so. At least 11 states require that schools keep epinephrine on hand, and schools often receive EpiPens from the manufacturer at heavy discounts or free.
Baltimore County Public Schools, for instance, keeps about 400 EpiPens on hand in its 170 facilities. They record from 25 to 30 anaphylaxis cases annually, about two-thirds of which require stockpiled EpiPens. The rest are thrown away, said Debbie Somerville, the district’s coordinator for health services. It’s a similar story across the country. In San Francisco, the district’s public schools stock EpiPens and typically use fewer than 10 a year and dispose of about 120. Both systems receive the devices for free.
In Baltimore, Somerville said, a switch to syringes and epinephrine has been discussed. But “it’s very hard to make the argument” when emergencies can happen without a school nurse or medical professional on hand and a failure to administer the hormone quickly and correctly could be fatal, she explained. That said, “if we had to buy them at market rate right now, it would be a significant investment.”
Allergy patients who are advised to carry around this emergency treatment also don’t necessarily have the specialized medical knowledge to fill a syringe on the spot. They need something easier, with less room for error. That’s why the EpiPen, and in particular the auto-injector, has become so popular.
But, as cost-sharing grows and prices climb, cheaper, homegrown alternatives are catching on, said José Gómez-Márquez, an instructor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He runs a lab focused on promoting do-it-yourself medical technology. Márquez’s team, which started out researching how widespread this notion had become, found a growing interest among health professionals to create innovative solutions to patients’ problems. This work led to a broader online effort known as Maker Health, which functions as a clearinghouse for ideas he calls “hardware protocols.”
In one such protocol, a nurse at one Texas hospital devised a portable and adjustable three-head shower that makes it easier to wash burn patients by keeping damaged skin tissue away from the water spray. Traditionally, nurses have spent hours washing these patients, manually moving around the showerhead. This fix saves labor, time, water and money.
“If you have extreme health care circumstances, you will find extreme health care ingenuity,” he said. “Five years ago nobody cared about pricing. Today, people are more price-sensitive.”
That’s true of London’s allergy patients — for whom those EpiPen price hikes matter a great deal.
“The ones who have no insurance, or whose insurance has no [drug] coverage — they just go without,” London said. “They carry around the expired one. They think it’s going to work, and no, it isn’t.”
KHN’s coverage of prescription drug development, costs and pricing is supported in part by the Laura and John Arnold Foundation.